Cases 41 - 50 of 2,328
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CARDENAS v. BUSINESS DEBT ADJUSTERS LLC
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
ERICA CARDENAS
Defendant:
BUSINESS DEBT ADJUSTERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
David Sussman v. Shevaun Harris, et al
as 24-10442
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHARLES SUSSMAN, a.k.a. El Maestro
Defendant:
SHEVAUN HARRIS, in their official capacity, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, (hereinafter Wellpath), DONALD SAWYER, Corporate Vice President at Wellpath, supra. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cardenas et al v. New Generations Concrete, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Fredy Cardenas and Isai Rodriguez
Defendant:
New Generations Concrete, LLC and Francisco De Matto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
S.L. v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
S.L.
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Officer Daniel Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Cardenas Zepeda v. Garland
as 24-215
Petitioner:
DANNIA YOSELYN CARDENAS ZEPEDA and LEONEL ANDRE BETANCO-CARDENAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
