Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,438
Chapman v. Leeds
as 1:2024cv01106
Petitioner: Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent: Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Eddie Carr, Jazemine Adams, Brandon D Alexander-Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, official and personal capacity, named as Heidi Washington, JEREMY BUSH, Deputy Director, official and personal capacity, ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity and others
South et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Robert South, Edward W Allsman, David L Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Shawn Otte v. Arron Wilson, et al
as 24-1992
Plaintiff: Shawn Otte
Defendant: Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Michael Fusselman and others
Caldwell v. Musk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv02022
Defendant: X Corp., Elon Musk, Twitter Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Nicholas Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Charles v. Chapman
as 1:2024cv00493
Petitioner: Lawrence Charles
Respondent: Michael Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chapman Technology Group, Inc. v. RiskOptics, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00394
Plaintiff: Chapman Technology Group, Inc.
Defendant: RiskOptics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
CHAPMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05181
Defendant: LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
Plaintiff: WANDA CHAPMAN
Not Yet Classified: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICE AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marion Chapman v. Clay Stanton
as 24-1974
Petitioner: Marion M. Chapman
Respondent: Clay Stanton, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?