Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 342
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff: Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant: John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant: Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01713
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv03235
Plaintiff: Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant: Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00359
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00646
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cokely v. Thornton
as 4:2021cv01195
Petitioner: Donald Chadwick Cokely
Respondent: Drake Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cokely v. Smith
as 4:2021cv01194
Petitioner: Donald Chadwick Cokely
Respondent: Lucretia Battles Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cokely v. Scott
as 4:2021cv01196
Petitioner: Donald Chadwick Cokely
Respondent: Stedman Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cokley v. Weathington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv01193
Petitioner: Donald Cokley
Respondent: Billy Weathington
Plaintiff: Donald Chadwick Cokely
Defendant: Lucretia Battles Smith, Drake Thornton and Stedman Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?