Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 86
BOLOGNA et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03692
Plaintiff: DANIEL MICHAEL BOLOGNA and JOAN CECELIA BOLOGNA
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marilu F. Touma v. The General Counsel of the Regents et al
as 8:2017cv01132
Defendant: Dr. Roy Altman, Nick Baca, DOES and others
Plaintiff: Marilu F. Touma
Kane v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01051
Plaintiff: Daniel Michael Kane
Defendant: State of California, City of Sacramento and County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salinas v. USA
as 1:2017cv00293
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Daniel Michael Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kelley v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2017cv00056
Petitioner: Daniel Michael Kelley
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10163
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Kane v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00150
Plaintiff: Daniel Michael Kane
Defendant: People of the State of Calfornia, State of California, City of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv11550
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PARY v. USA
as 2:2016cv12317
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: DANIEL MICHAEL PARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Daniel Szabo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-13582
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL MICHAEL SZABO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?