Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 9:2008cv01911
Petitioner:
David Ray Hicks
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and John LaManna
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. David Hicks
as 07-5126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID A. HICKS
David Hicks v. Michael Astrue
as 07-1424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David A. Hicks
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Hicks v. Caddo Parish Animal Control et al
as 5:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
David L Hicks
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Animal Control, Caddo Parish Animal Control, Parish of Caddo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Provencio, et al. v. Vasquez, et al.
as 1:2007cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Provencio, Jr., Nancy Mendoza and Johnny G. Provencio
Defendant:
Patricia L. Vazquez, Patricia L. Vazquez, Patricia L. Vazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richmond Medical Center for Wo v. Michael Herring
as 03-1821
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHMOND MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN and WILLIAM G. FITZHUGH, M.D., on behalf of themselves, their staffs, and their patients
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID M. HICKS, in his official capacity as Commonwealth Attorney for the City of Richmond, MICHAEL N. HERRING, in his official capacity as Commonwealth Attorney for the City of Richmond and WADE A. KIZER, in his official capacity as Commonwealth Attorney for the County of Henrico
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
HORATIO R. STORER FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, ROBERT B. MARSHALL, Virginia Delegate, KATHY B. BYRON, Virginia Delegate and others
Amicus Supporting Appellee:
PHYSICIANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE AND HEALTH, VANESSA E. CULLINS, Vice President for Medical Affairs, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, FORTY-TWO INDIVIDUAL PHYSICIANS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
