Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 205,578
SHELTON v. JOHN DOE ENTITY IDENTIFIED AS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) COMPLIANCE SERVICES
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff: JAMES E. SHELTON
Defendant: JOHN DOE ENTITY IDENTIFIED AS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) COMPLIANCE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Smith v. Arresting Officers et al
as 4:2024cv01911
Plaintiff: Nicole E. Smith
Defendant: Arresting Officers, Houston Police Department and Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmon v. Clean Harbors Deer Park LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01899
Plaintiff: Patsy E. Carmon
Defendant: Clean Harbors Deer Park LLC, Daniel Tauriello, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 988 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00526
Plaintiff: GPM Investments, LLC d/b/a E-Z Mart
Defendant: Harriet Louise Rehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
GPM Investments, LLC d/b/a E-Z Mart v. Rehman
as 5:2024cv00527
Plaintiff: GPM Investments, LLC d/b/a E-Z Mart
Defendant: Harriet Louise Rehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kinikin v. Ferguson
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff: Jeremiah N Kinikin
Defendant: Michael E Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Moore
as 24-1359
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KEVIN E. MOORE
US v. Vance Bowles
as 24-6484
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: VANCE E. BOWLES
Ashley MaxwellIn re: Ashley Maxwell
as 24-50390
Petitioner: In re: Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell, Mistie Sharp and others
Respondent: Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Williams v. Luna, et al.
as 24-3187
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant: SHERIFF LUNA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?