Cases 41 - 50 of 412
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02611
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dillard v. State of Oregon
as 23-50171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carvel Gordon Dillard
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Oregon, Christopher Wray, Director of the F.B.I., Oregon Governor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hutchins v. Arlington County Mental Behavioral Health Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
Arlington County Mental Behavioral Health Dept., Michael T. Baylous, Officer A. Sawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ewing v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv02949
Plaintiff:
Davien Ewing
Defendant:
John Doe, F.B.I. and Several Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
