Cases 41 - 50 of 12,629
Fields v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Debbie L. Fields
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Fruzzetti v. Town Counsel Chair, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
LEE FRUZZETTI
Defendant:
TOWN COUNSEL CHAIR, Town of Plymouth, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DANIEL PERRY, Easton Police Detective and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fields v. State Attorney's Office for the Ninth Judicial Circuit et al
as 6:2024cv00879
Petitioner:
Charlie C. Fields
Respondent:
Warden, Orange County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Hult v. Carey et al
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ernie Gustav Hult
Defendant:
Erin Carey and BLM Field Office
Bordelon v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Reece Bordelon
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Brandsafway, LLC, Brandsafway Industries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
