Cases 41 - 50 of 4,021
Alaraidah v. Garg et al
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Musa Alaraidah
Defendant:
The Estate of Richard I. Eisenstadt, Diane K. Jorkasky, M. Scott Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Manago v. Hap Trucking Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv01496
Defendant:
Gurham Singh Gill, Hap Transportation Group, Ltd. and Hap Trucking Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Michaela Manago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Garcia v. Hap Trucking Ltd. et al
as 2:2024at00889
Defendant:
Gurham Singh Gill, Hap Transportation Group, Ltd. and Hap Trucking Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Quentin Paul Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Gray v. City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, Cody Gill and David Wilder
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BMO Bank N.A. v. H&R Transport, et al.
as 1:2024cv00710
Defendant:
H&R Transport and Harmandeep Singh Gill
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brunner v. City of Payson Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Defendant:
FNU Gille, T. Cressall, J. White and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Earl Brunner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk v. Kartchner, et al
as 24-4067
Defendant:
SIM GILL, SAM HESSI, MONTE KARTCHNER and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R.E. RUSK
Pal Gill Trucking, Inc. v. Lancashire Cargo Consortium
as 1:2024cv00770
Defendant:
Lancashire Cargo Consortium
Plaintiff:
Pal Gill Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
