Cases 41 - 50 of 245
Crumbley v. Stewart et al
as 2:2021cv00916
Plaintiff:
Shanon Crumbley
Defendant:
Tom Foy Stewart, Sixth Judicial District Atty, Jo Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Mexico v. Crumbley
as 2:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
Shanon Crumbley and State of New Mexico
Defendant:
Tom Foy Stewart, Sixth Judicial District Atty, Jo Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
A.A.M. et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 2:2021cv01619
Plaintiff:
A.A.M., Wendy Grijalva, A.B.M. and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Jeremiah Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.A.M. et al v. Sacramento City et al
as 2:2021at00849
Plaintiff:
A.A.M., Wendy Grijalva, A.B.M. and others
Defendant:
Sacramento City and Jeremiah Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettis v. Grijalva et al
as 1:2021cv07505
Plaintiff:
Zubearu Bettis
Defendant:
Officer Grijalua, Captain Darden, Warden Lincoln-Vitale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. UPMC Chautauqua et al
as 1:2021cv00839
Plaintiff:
J. Michael Glenn, M.D.
Defendant:
UPMC Chautauqua and Galo Grijalva, M.D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Tober v. Laura Armstead
as 21-6801
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA ARMSTEAD, Warden, L. JOBE, Sgt. and P. OWENS, Sgt.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN GRIJALVA TOBER
Carino-Grijalva v. Garland
as 21-100
Petitioner:
LUIS CARINO-GRIJALVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
GRIJALVA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22623
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAYNOR GRIJALVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2021cv00852
Defendant:
Sergeant Evan Cox, Officer Jeffrey Crouch, Officer Michael Devezin and others
Not Classified By Court:
John Roes 1-50
Plaintiff:
Lauren E Chustz, Bilal Ali-Bey and Remingtyn A Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
