Cases 41 - 50 of 90
BYRD v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01949
Plaintiff:
DONETTA BYRD
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and BRIAN F. HOLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Midfirst Bank v. Virginia Theresa Holeman et al
as 2:2014cv09577
Defendant:
Does, Robin L Holbrook, Virginia Theresa Holeman and others
Plaintiff:
Midfirst Bank
Holeman v. Dart
as 1:2014cv07213
Plaintiff:
Lander Holeman
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Ajose et al
as 1:2014cv02546
Plaintiff:
Domnick Brooks
Defendant:
Owsegun Ajose, Alvarez Holeman, Shawn Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holeman v. Dart
as 1:2014cv05950
Plaintiff:
Lander Holeman
Defendant:
Thommas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holeman v. Dart
as 1:2014cv04950
Plaintiff:
Lander Holeman
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Permanent easement totaling 2.322 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 3.209 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 83.00 acres in et al
as 3:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
Permanent easement totaling 2.322 acres, more or less, and temporary easements totaling 3.209 acres, more or less, over a parcel of land in Brunswick County, Virginia of approximately 83.00 acres in, Celeste Yvonne James, Sylvia Laverne (James) Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Holeman v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2014cv03442
Plaintiff:
Lander Holeman
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kathryn Holeman v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2013cv02169
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Holeman
Louis McClendon v. James Holeman
as 13-60668
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS MCCLENDON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HOLEMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
