Cases 41 - 50 of 122
(PC)Saenz v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01262
Defendant:
Coder, O'Boyle, Mule Creek State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Saenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv07121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gelon v. Haugh
as 1:2018cv00497
Defendant:
Christie Anne Haugh
Plaintiff:
Steven Gelon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owen v. Haugh-Owen
as 4:2018cv00249
Petitioner:
Aled Lloyd Owen
Respondent:
Madeline Kathleen Haugh-Owen
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001
TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS v. J. HAUGH CRANES INC.
as 2:2018cv03397
Petitioner:
TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS
Respondent:
J. HAUGH CRANES INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Cabral et al v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02841
Defendant:
3535 LV NEWCO, LLC, Caesars Enterprise Services, LLC, Caesars Entertainment Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Margarita Cabral, Dustin Chapman, Stephanie Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS v. J. HAUGH CRANES, INC.
as 2:2017cv05986
Respondent:
J. HAUGH CRANES, INC.
Petitioner:
TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Haugh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
Curtis James Haugh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00328
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Winston v. Martin et al
as 2:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
LeAnthony T. Winston
Defendant:
Everett A. Martin and John F. Haugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
