Cases 41 - 50 of 54,351
Harmon v. ABC 2 News Station et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Larry L Harmon
Defendant:
ABC 2 News Station, wbay.com, Green Bay Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zunzurovski v. Fisher
as 24-1305
Plaintiff:
ALEKSANDAR ZUNZUROVSKI
Defendant:
LAINE FISHER, MICHAEL J. TAUBENFELD, FISHER TAUBENFELD, LLP and others
Castro v. Wallace
as 24-50379
Plaintiff:
Hubert Edward Castro
Defendant:
Warden Darren Wallace, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Assistant Warden Toby Powell, TDCJ Hughes Unit, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Chimdi Akwitti and others
Armour v. TX Board of Pardons
as 24-40347
Plaintiff:
Artis Armour
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, David Gutierriez, Paul Keil and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jaime v. Doe
as 1:2024cv03824
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Quantum Group, LLC v. Halcyon HempWorks, LLC et al.
as 5:2024cv00867
Defendant:
Kathryn Purmal, Halcyon HempWorks, LLC, James Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Quantum Group, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Malik Williams
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Hardwick et al
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert A. Hardwick, Matthew Cline, Joshua Woolsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
