Cases 41 - 50 of 17,722
West v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne West
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey, John Emberton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWERS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
JEREMY POWERS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Watkins v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Keenan Watkins
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillette v. Umatilla County Fire District #1 et al
as 2:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Gillette
Defendant:
Umatilla County Fire District #1, James C. Ferraris and Ferraris Investigations & Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Smith v. Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
as 7:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Quinn and Scharr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Katchatag v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Katchatag
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom, Jeremy Hough, A. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
as 3:2024cv03547
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan
Defendant:
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ryan v. X CORP.
as 3:2024cv03551
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan
Defendant:
X CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
