Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Johnson v. Duke Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00529
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-30, Duke Energy Benefits Committee and Duke Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MCCLAIN v. CAUSEY et al
as 1:2020cv00695
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, JOHN MICHAEL CAUSEY, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE and others
Plaintiff:
DALLAS R. MCCLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Cathey et al
as 3:2020cv00406
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin V. Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2020cv00634
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
CHIEF CERELYN DAVIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DURHAM, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lassiter et al
as 1:2020cv00058
Defendant:
FNU Slater, FNU Ayscue, Norma Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Benson Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Taylor et al
as 5:2020ct03079
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, John Does 1-100, Nurse Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Offie Curtis Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARMER v. DOE #1 et al
as 1:2019cv01111
Plaintiff:
DEE DEIDRE FARMER
Defendant:
DUKE REGIONAL HOSPITAL and JANE DOE #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American General Life Insurance Company v. Ruiz et al
as 4:2019cv00140
Plaintiff:
American General Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 - 10, John R. Hultin, Phillip Mark Parott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2019cv00774
Defendant:
NORMA MELTON, KENNETH LASSITER, JEFFERY PATANE and others
Plaintiff:
BENSON MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORENO v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2019cv00360
Defendant:
KIM RUSSELL, JOHN DOE 1-10 and JANE DOE 1-10
Plaintiff:
MANUEL MORENO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
