Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv03171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lester Ruston v. Dallas County Texas, et al
as 10-10434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS, JAMES K ELLIS, A. JOE FISH, U. S. District Judge and others
Taylor v. Fitzwater et al
as 9:2010cv00018
Defendant:
Sidney A. Fitzwater, Barefoot Sanders and A. Joe Fish
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fabain Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lester Ruston v. Dallas County Texas, et al
as 09-10976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS, JAMES K ELLIS, A. JOE FISH, U. S. District Judge and others
Stinson v. Maynard, et al
as 08-6238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAOMI A. STINSON, as a private attorney general
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN SLABOTSKY, ALLISON MAYNARD, CLAIRE V. EAGAN, Chief U.S. District Judge and others
Odeh v. Mitchell, et al
as 08-11019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA ODEH
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN MITCHELL, A. JOE FISH, U. S. District Judge, TERRY R. MEANS, U. S. District Judge and others
Odeh v. Fish et al
as 4:2008cv00549
Plaintiff:
Sam Odeh
Defendant:
A. Joe Fish, Scott Allen Maule, William F. Sanderson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Odeh v. Roper, et al
as 08-10780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA ODEH
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ROPER, CHARLES M BLEIL, TERRY R. MEANS, U. S. District Judge and others
Ruston v. Dallas County Texas, et al
as 08-10440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS, JAMES K ELLIS, A. JOE FISH, U. S. District Judge and others
Odeh v. Fish et al
as 4:2007cv00696
Plaintiff:
Sam Odeh
Defendant:
A Joe Fish and Jerry Buchmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
