Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Cerezo et al v. Thai Pot, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02598
Defendant:
Black Thai, Inc., Swee Chan Cheong, Thai Malay Cafe Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Cerezo, Jose Dejesus Parada Ugarte and Fernando Morales Campos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Granados v. Singas et al.
as 2:2016cv02212
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Granados
Respondent:
Hon. Madeline Singas and Michael Sposato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez
as 2:2015at00973
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joe A. Lizarraga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Gonzalez v. Lizarraga
as 2:2015cv01961
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Gonzalez
Respondent:
Joe A. Lizarraga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mojarro et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12958
Plaintiff:
Rosalina Mojarro and Jose DeJesus Mojarro
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv03420
Plaintiff:
Larry Alexander , Charles Allen , Karen Allen and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEJESUS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00417
Petitioner:
JOSE DEJESUS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
DEJESUS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00397
Petitioner:
JOSE DEJESUS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Antonio Aguirre-Sanchez, et al v. Webb's Seafood Inc.
as 14-14579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO AGUIRRE-SANCHEZ, JOSE GUADALUPE AGUIRRE-SANCHEZ, JOSE DEJESUS MANDUJANO-PAREDES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WEBB'S SEAFOOD INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
