Cases 41 - 50 of 80
King v. Onwaunabe et al
as 8:2017cv01654
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Onwaunabe and Schrumpf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Mitchell et al
as 8:2016cv03804
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Van T. Mitchell , John Robison , Thomas Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera Lopez et al v. Joe Vin Enterprises LLC et al
as 7:2016cv08652
Defendant:
Joe Vin Enterprises LLC, Joseph King and Vincent King
Plaintiff:
Juan Rivera Lopez and Jaime Lopez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207
Alphonzo Eleby v. Lee May, et al
as 16-16438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALPHONZO ELEBY
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE MAY, in his official capacity as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Dekalb County and JOSEPH KING
Alphonzo Eleby v. Demetrius Kendrick
as 16-16320
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALPHONZO ELEBY
Defendant - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS KENDRICK
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
JOSEPH KING and LEE MAY
King et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv04415
Plaintiff:
Tammy King and Joseph King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Expeditors & Production Services Co
as 6:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cox , Russell Wayne Hauck , Dustin Henson and others
Defendant:
Expeditors & Production Services Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2016cv80337
Plaintiff:
Franklin Joseph King
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Soto
as 4:2016cv00730
Petitioner:
Warren Joseph King
Respondent:
J. Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
