Cases 41 - 50 of 30,639
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ALFONSO, and all others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. 216 (B) v. THE VILLAGE OF KINGS CREEK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. A Florida Not Profit Corporation
as 1:2024cv21830
Plaintiff:
JAIME ALFONSO, and all others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. 216 (B)
Defendant:
THE VILLAGE OF KINGS CREEK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. A Florida Not Profit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
King v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00434
Petitioner:
Christopher T King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
King v. Bolton et al
as 1:2024cv02026
Plaintiff:
Cory King
Defendant:
Raymond Bolton, Capstone Trucking, Inc. and Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. RK Family, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
RK Family, Inc., RK Holdings, LLP doing business as Rural King and Shaun Amrine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
