Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Wilson v. Bayer Corporation et al
as ILS/3:12-cv-10975
Plaintiff:
Kelly Wilson
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilson v. Rounds
as 2:2010cv02333
Petitioner:
Kelly Wilson
Respondent:
- Rounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv11539
Plaintiff:
Christina Brown , Christine Smith , Anastasia Yarmy and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haugabrook v. Cason et al
as 7:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
Artrice D. Haugabrook
Defendant:
William O Cason, Valdosta City Schools, Valdosta City School Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kelly Wilson v. People of the State of Califor
as 10-16429
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELLY WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Wilson v. The People Of The State Of California
as 2:2010cv00433
Petitioner:
Kelly Wilson
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamburg v. West Plaza Management, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00383
Petitioner:
Faith Connor Hamburg
Defendant:
West Plaza Management, Inc., Joe Ting and Kelly Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wilson v. Evans et al
as 2:2007cv01577
Petitioner:
Kelly Wilson
Respondent:
Evans and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnett et al v. Sentry Credit, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00594
Plaintiff:
Dianne Arnett and Amy E. Wilson
Defendant:
Sentry Credit, Inc., Sentry Credit, Inc., Kelly Valadez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
