Cases 41 - 50 of 354
JONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kevin Smith v. United States Government
as 23-1044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA and others
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Sharp et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv09184
Plaintiff:
Dan T. Sharp, Dana W. Hart, Darryl J. Brown and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hoff v. Krabbenhoft et al
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Hoff
Defendant:
Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler, Jordan Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Kevin Green
as 22-5850
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL GREEN
WARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17420
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL WARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FEROLI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL FEROLI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAGE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14702
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL PAGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPEARING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13439
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL SPEARING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
