Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill et al v. Martin Logistics, Inc., et al
as 5:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
Larry Hill , Pam Hill and Henry R. Fisher
Defendant:
Alice F. Martin and Martin Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Samuel Coleman v. Robert Naples, et al
as 12-2427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL LEON COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT NAPLES, Warden, JEFFREY C. STIEVE, MD, Chief Medical Officer,, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC., a foreign profit corporation, and others
Daniel Hargrove v. Warden, et al
as 12-14871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HARGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, LARRY HILL and GEORGE IVEY, Deputy Warden
HILL et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv03959
Plaintiff:
MARY HILL and LARRY HILL
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gresham #272603 v. Violetta et al
as 2:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Unknown Violetta, Unknown Lamarche, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #183037 v. Engelsgjerd et al
as 2:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jones #183037
Defendant:
Michael Engelsgjerd, Fernando E. Frontera, Richard Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Detroit, City of, Treasury Department
as 2:2011cv13406
Plaintiff:
Larry Hill
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Treasury Department
Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Cary Quattrocchi, et al
as 11-15814
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
SKYDIVE ARIZONA, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
CARY QUATTROCCHI and BEN BUTLER
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
CASC, INC., USSO, LLC, DBA 1800SkyRide, AKA 1800Skyride.com, ATLANTA SC, INC. and others
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
LARRY HILL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
