Cases 41 - 50 of 2,193
Braggs v. Madden
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Charles Braggs
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Onley v. Madden
as 24-426
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES ONLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN
Brandes v. Steven Madden, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gloria Brandes
Defendant:
Steven Madden, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gonzales v. Madden et al
as 3:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Helidoro S. Gonsales and Helidoro S Gonzales
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, S. Gates, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Madden v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00629
Petitioner:
Joseph Benjamin Madden, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wynne et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv09955
Plaintiff:
Willis Wynne, Jonathan De Crescenzo, Scott Konig and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
BREEZEE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
JASON M BREEZEE, KYLE M. BUMP, CHRISTOPHER L. BURNHAM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
