Cases 41 - 50 of 112
COVINGTON et al v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LITTLE COVINGTON , HERMAN BENTHLE LEWIS, JR. , VIOLA RYALS FIGUEROA and others
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT A. RUCHO, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2015cv01425
Plaintiff:
Mary W. Thomas
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Thomas v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv04530
Plaintiff:
Mary Lisa Thomas
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boler v. Thomas et al
as 2:2015cv02223
Petitioner:
Chris Boler
Respondent:
Mary Elizabeth Thomas and Amy P. Weirich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boler v. Weirich et al
as 2:2015cv02222
Plaintiff:
Chris Boler
Defendant:
Amy P. Weirich and Mary Elizabeth Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:15-cv-01552
Plaintiff:
MARY LISA THOMAS
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and C.R. BARD, INC.
THOMAS v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv01552
Plaintiff:
MARY LISA THOMAS
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Thomas et al
as 2:2015cv02180
Petitioner:
Curterrio Wilson
Respondent:
Mary Elizabeth Thomas, Amy P. Weirich, Carolyn Wade Blackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clayton v. Thomas et al
as 2:2015cv02162
Petitioner:
Cleve Clayton
Respondent:
Mary Elizabeth Thomas and Amy P. Weirich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clayton v. Weirich et al
as 2:2015cv02161
Plaintiff:
Cleve Clayton
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Mary Elizabeth Thomas and Paula Skahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
