Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv07635
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Jones v. Chuck E Cheese et al
as 2:2009cv02584
Plaintiff:
Michael L Jones
Defendant:
Chuck E Cheese and Tom Malladine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00457
Petitioner:
Michael L. Jones
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael v. John Doe et al
as 1:2009cv02625
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00018
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc., Dolgencorp, Inc., Dolgencorp, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones, Michael L. Jones, Michael L. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00539
Plaintiff:
John C. Johnson, William Gregory, Daymien J. Roberts and others
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Rick Kearney, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Jones
as 08-30735
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: MICHAEL L JONES
Appellant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Appellee:
MICHAEL L JONES
Jones et al v. Cannon et al
as 3:2008cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael L Jones, Michael L Jones, Sue Ellen Jones and others
Defendant:
Michael B Cannon, Manley Carrell, Jr, Canal Indemnity Co and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Michael Jones v. George Galaza
as 08-16142
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE GALAZA, Warden
Jones v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00791
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones
Defendant:
Thomas Carroll, David Pierce, David Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
