Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Ellersick et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv06525
Plaintiff:
John Ellersick , David Ellersick , Travis Myles and others
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. and Monro Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Quint v. muffler brake inc et al
as 1:2009cv11997
Plaintiff:
Frederick Quint
Defendant:
monro muffler brake inc and first unum life ins co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mcaninch et al v. Monroe Muffler Brake Inc
as 2:2009cv00989
Plaintiff:
William Mcaninch, William Mcaninch, Casey Wheeler and others
Defendant:
Monroe Muffler Brake Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Colomb et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Reginald M. Colomb, Jennifer Colomb, Christopher Colomb and others
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc., Michelin North America, Inc. and Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ellis v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01214
Plaintiff:
Allan Ellis
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
