Cases 41 - 50 of 220
Benton v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Benny Benton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Shane Price
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullen v. Jackson
as 5:2022cv05213
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Cullen
Defendant:
Warden Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cullen v. Jackson
as 3:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Cullen
Defendant:
Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moone v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Elaine Willow Rose Moone
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III and Thomas Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Jaramillo et al
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Dalon V Rodgers
Defendant:
Denisse Jaramillo, Corey Carter, Moses Jackson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Badger v. Cain
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Craytonia Badger
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Moses Jackson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchanan v. Melton et al
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buchanan
Defendant:
Corey Melton, Baker, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silverman v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Julius Silverman
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochran v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
James David Cochran
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Solomon Graves, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
