Cases 41 - 50 of 166
Verkada, Inc. v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06858
Plaintiff:
Verkada, Inc.
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc., Avigilon Corporation, Avigilon Fortress Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Motorola Solutions, Inc., et al v. Hytera Communications Corporat
as 21-3054
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.
Defendant / Appellant:
HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LTD.
Harold Pick v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv08702
Plaintiff:
Harold Pick
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc., United States Department of Justice and Kent J Vandersteen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Motorola Solutions, Inc., et al v. Hytera Communications Corporat, et al
as 21-2635
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.
Defendant / Appellant:
HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LTD., HYTERA AMERICA, INC. and HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS AMERICA (WEST), INC.
Motorola Solutions, Inc., et al v. Hytera Communications Corporat, et al
as 21-2721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.
Defendant / Appellee:
HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LTD., HYTERA AMERICA, INC. and HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS AMERICA (WEST), INC.
The MNM Group, Inc. v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv02057
Plaintiff:
The MNM Group, Inc. and MNM Group Consulting, LLC
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc., Liberty Mutual Ins Co. and Pyramid Network Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Harold Pick v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv08011
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc., Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Pick
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant:
OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff:
George Kruse and Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Golden v. Apple Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv04353
Defendant:
General Motors Company, Verizon Corporation Service Group, Motorola Solutions Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Golden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
