Cases 41 - 50 of 1,494
Cockream v. Herod et al
as 1:2023cv04610
Plaintiff:
Deshaun Michael Cockream
Defendant:
Herod, Michalski and J. Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. OUTLAW RENTALS INC et al
as 5:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE C. SMITH and STEPHANIE C SMITH
Defendant:
OUTLAW RENTALS, INC., CLASSY CYCLES, INC., COLLEEN SWAB and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gibson et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gibson and Russell Schultz
Defendant:
City of Portland, Multnomah County, Multnomah County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GLOVER v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2023cv02057
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
DANIEL OUTLAW, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER OLEYN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLOVER v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
DANIEL OUTLAW, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE MOFFA NICHOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OUTLAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11524
Plaintiff:
KENDALL C OUTLAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Liriano v. Outlaw-Bey et al
as 1:2023cv03769
Plaintiff:
Juana Fernandez Liriano and Juana Liriano Fernandez
Defendant:
Gene Outlaw-Bey and EWB Enterprise LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
