Cases 1 - 10 of 1,460
OUTLAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
ANDREW OUTLAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OUTLAW v. USA
as 1:2023cv01658
Petitioner:
DERRICK OUTLAW
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RIDDLE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
HERNDON HUNT OUTLAW RIDDLE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Roma Mikha, Inc., et al v. Tauler Smith, LLP
as 23-55703
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OUTLAW LABORATORIES, LP LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROMA MIKHA, INC., a California Corporation, DBA Bobar, NMRM, INC. and SKYLINE MARKET, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
TAULER SMITH, LLP
MORIN v. OUTLAW RENTALS INC et al
as 5:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
ZACHERY MORIN
Defendant:
OUTLAW RENTALS INC, CLASSY CYCLES INC and COLLEEN SWAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Outlaw et al v. Anderson et al
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
WIllie Outlaw, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of RYAN OUTLAW, Cheryl Outlaw, Ryan Outlaw Jr. and others
Defendant:
Ian Anderson, Jadah Brown and Salt Lake City Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cockream v. Herod et al
as 1:2023cv04610
Plaintiff:
Deshaun Michael Cockream
Defendant:
Herod, Michalski and J. Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. OUTLAW RENTALS INC et al
as 5:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE C. SMITH and STEPHANIE C SMITH
Defendant:
OUTLAW RENTALS, INC., CLASSY CYCLES, INC., COLLEEN SWAB and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
