Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Action Door of Lorain County, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02349
Plaintiff:
Peter Johnson
Defendant:
Action Door of Lorain County, Inc., Toni Marie Cavasini and David Cavasini
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Antonello Boldrini v. Martin Wilson, et al
as 16-3565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN R. WILSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY D. PETER JOHNSON, JANE DOE, Personally and in his official capacity as Secretary of the District Attorney of Union County PA and others
Marshall v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Zamfira D. Marshall
Defendant:
Park White, James G. Blanchard and Peter Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delacruz et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02570
Plaintiff:
Jose DeLeon and Manuel Para
Defendant:
The City of New York , Peter Johnson , Terrence Blumenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10257
Plaintiff:
Adam Johnson , Kelly Griffin , Keith Wesolowski and others
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. and DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burritt, Paul v. Steffen, Daniel et al
as 3:2015cv00701
Plaintiff:
Paul Burritt
Defendant:
Daniel Steffen, Peter Johnson, Steven Moe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:15-cv-07963
Defendant:
Fanduel, Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Johnson , Kelly Griffin , Keith Wesolowski and others
Johnson v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:15-cv-07963
Plaintiff:
Adam Johnson , Kelly Griffin , Keith Wesolowski and others
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.
Johnson v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:15-cv-07963
Plaintiff:
Adam Johnson , Kelly Griffin , Keith Wesolowski and others
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
