Cases 41 - 50 of 218
Arguello v. Ravnsborg et al
as 4:2020cv04088
Respondent:
Darin Young and Jason R. Ravnsborg
Petitioner:
Joseph Arguello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McPeek v. Meyers et al
as 4:2020cv04078
Defendant:
Warden Darin Young, Lt. Dykstra, Unkown Property Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Travis R. McPeek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ludens v. Gilbertson et al
as 5:2020cv05027
Defendant:
Judge Susan M. Sabers, Reed Rasmussen, Judge Jane Wipf Pfeifle and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary D. Ludens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houg v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv04056
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Eugene Houg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steffen et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv04057
Plaintiff:
Cathy Steffen, Robert V Steffen and Robert V. Steffen
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sissoko v. Billion Chevrolet, Sioux Falls, South Dakota; et al
as 4:2020cv04048
Plaintiff:
Karim Sissoko
Defendant:
Billion Chevrolet, Sioux Falls, South Dakota; et al, Dave R Billion, The Registered Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv05079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cramer v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv04178
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Justin Cramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cormier et al v. Wientjes et al
as 1:2019cv01021
Defendant:
Wayne Kanyuh and Cody R. Wientjes
Plaintiff:
Peggy Cormier and Robert Cormier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. W.R. Berkley Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv05048
Defendant:
W.R. Berkley Corporation and Berkley Human Services
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
