Cases 41 - 50 of 2,852
Francis v. Bordelon
as 2:2023cv06981
Petitioner:
Rudy Francis
Respondent:
Warden Donnie Bordelon and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Donnie Bordelon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudy v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv06969
Plaintiff:
Zachary Rudy
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
USA v. Deleon
as 23-50829
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rudy Rodriguez Deleon
Thompson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv16054
Plaintiff:
Rudy Manuel Thompson
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Sheriff's Department, Prosecuter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mateo-Najera, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3457
Petitioner:
RUDY FERNANDO MATEO-NAJERA, EVELYN D LORENZO-MATEO and GUADALUPE E MATEO-LORENZO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lamborn et al v. Ketchum et al
as 9:2023cv81471
Plaintiff:
Amy Lamborn
Defendant:
John W Ketchum, James Robo, Eric Silagy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
David Hardy, et al v. Keith Rudy, et al
as 23-1985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. HARDY and SIMEON HARDY
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH RUDY, Trooper and ROBERT WAGNER, Captain
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MENDEZ v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv21659
Petitioner:
RUDI RENE MENDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
