Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
ROGERS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv00367
Petitioner: RICHARD ROGERS
Respondent: MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Ashe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv30055
Petitioner: Richard Rogers
Respondent: Michael Ashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00395
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rogers v. Ashe et al
as 3:2012cv30188
Plaintiff: Richard Rogers
Defendant: Michael Ashe and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feldon Bush, Sr. v. Edward Rendell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2221
Plaintiff - Appellant: FELDON BUSH, SR., JAMES HILL and ANTHONY ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARD G. RENDELL, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAMAS and others
ROGERS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2012cv00541
Petitioner: RICHARD ROGERS
Respondent: MARIROSA LAMAS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3111
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3112
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv03080
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv03076
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?