Cases 41 - 50 of 260
TUCKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13044
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW TUCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Skidmore v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
as 3:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Skidmore
Respondent:
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
US v. Robert Sprouse
as 22-4429
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT ANDREW SPROUSE
REED v. WHITMER et al
as 1:2022cv01653
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED and ROBERT ANDREW BEY
Respondent:
CHRIS WHITMER, UNITED STATES PAROLE BOARD AGENCY, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mullins v. USA
as 4:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Mullins
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wolter v. Grady County of
as 5:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Wolter
Defendant:
Grady County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. WHITMER et al
as 2:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED CORP. SOLE doing business as ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
CHRIS WHITMER, ERICK HELENIHI, KEVIN PITROS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. WHITMER et al
as 2:2022cv02046
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED and ROBERT ANDREW BEY
Respondent:
CHRIS WHITMER, UNITED STATES PAROLE BOARD AGENCY, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
REED v. TISCHNER et al
as 1:2022cv00855
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
RICHARD S. TISCHNER and JENNIFER DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
(SS) Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
