Cases 41 - 50 of 7,557
Leet v. Cotone et al
as 6:2024cv00586
Not Yet Classified:
Government of Iberia Parish
Plaintiff:
Heath Leet
Defendant:
Tim Cotone, Deputy Kaila Chipman, Iberia Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Marquez v. Baker-Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Marquez
Defendant:
Amber Baker-Chavez, Elizabeth O-Rourke, Gerard Lavelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cindy Washington v. Michael Romero, et al
as 24-11358
Plaintiff:
CINDY ELAINE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROMERO, SUZE SUSALINE, MICHELLE BAPTISTE and others
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romero v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11157
Plaintiff:
Jessica Romero
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Reed v. Bean, et al.
as 24-2705
Plaintiff:
DAVID L REED
Defendant:
BEAN, Associate Warden, Lt GLENN FOWLER, JAMES DZURENDA, Director and others
Romero v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Romero, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romero-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-2655
Petitioner:
MARIA ROMERO-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
