Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Torgerson et al v. LCC International et al
as 2:2016cv02495
Plaintiff:
Richard Torgerson , Robert Hall , Shelley Gordon and others
Defendant:
LCC International, Inc. , Kenny Young, Brian Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
BAKER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2016cv00628
Petitioner:
PHILLIP SCOTT BAKER
Respondent:
DAVID MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne et al v. Baker
as 4:2014cv00473
Plaintiff:
Mr. Donald Payne, Jr. and Stephanie Taylor
Defendant:
Gregory Scott Baker and Caleb Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00875
Plaintiff:
Scott Baker
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffory Weaver et al v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles Zeigler, Michael Herczeg, Thomas E Streeter and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Mary Wyatt, et al v. Francis Gates, et al
as 14-3344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANCIS GATES, PATI HENSLEY, SARA HENSLEY and others
Appellant:
MARY N. WYATT, indivudually and as executrix of the Estate of RONALD E. WYATT, DANIEL WYATT, AMANDA LIPPELT and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Respondent:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., PATRICK SCOTT BAKER and AT&T CORPORATION
Mary Wyatt, et al v. Francis Gates, et al
as 14-3329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY N. WYATT, indivudually and as executrix of the Estate of RONALD E. WYATT, DANIEL WYATT, AMANDA LIPPELT and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANCIS GATES, PATI HENSLEY, SARA HENSLEY and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Respondent:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., PATRICK SCOTT BAKER and AT&T CORPORATION
Baker et al v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv22241
Plaintiff:
Naomi Jean Baker and Scott Baker
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.