Cases 41 - 50 of 3,094
Merritt v. Chapman et al
as 1:2024cv03675
Defendant:
Sheryl Lauren Chapman and Jeffrey Chapman
Plaintiff:
Angela Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Donald v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Renee Donald
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Jaramillo et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Steven Jaramillo, Christina Jaramillo and Sheryl Leblanc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
White v. Wesley Chapel Water System Inc
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee White
Defendant:
Wesley Chapel Water System Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Claiborne Electric Cooperative Inc
as 5:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lee White and Sheryl L White
Defendant:
Claiborne Electric Cooperative Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Maney, et al. v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-2715
Plaintiff:
PAUL MANEY, GARY CLIFT, THERON HALL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, COLETTE PETERS, HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Ezenwa v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Chibueze Ezenwa
Defendant:
United States of America, Sheryl Fryer and Channel 13 ABC TV/Walt Disney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rickey Benson v. Sheryl Lipman
as 24-5381
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
SHERYL H. LIPMAN, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant:
Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
