Cases 41 - 50 of 2,337
Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohsin Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohsin Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Syed v. USA
as 8:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Hammaduzzaman Syed
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Syed v. The United States of America
as 8:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Hammaduzzaman Syed
Respondent:
United States of America and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Viral DRM, LLC v. Thanh
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM, LLC
Defendant:
Uong Sy Thanh
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Eric White v. Brooge Energy Limited et al
as 2:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Eric White
Defendant:
Brooge Energy Limited f/k/a Brooge Holdings Limited f/k/a Twelve Seas Investment Company, Nicolaas L. Pardenkooper, Saleh Yammout and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
