Cases 1 - 10 of 2,333
UpHealth Holdings, Inc. v. Glocal Healthcare Systems Private Limited et al
as 1:2024cv03778
Petitioner:
UpHealth Holdings, Inc.
Respondent:
Glocal Healthcare Systems Private Limited, Dr. Syed Sabahat Azim, Richa Sana Azim and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Thola Dean Piens
Defendant:
Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Pope v. Chattik et al
as 3:2024cv50172
Plaintiff:
Kerry L. Pope
Defendant:
Nurse Chattik and Dr. Larry Sy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florio v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1177
Plaintiff:
SYED ZAHEER and TRAVIS FLORIO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hemant Patel, M.D., P.C. v. Bandikatla M.D.
as 24-1071
Not Yet Classified:
HEMANT PATEL, M.D., P.C. and THEJAWSI BANDIKATLA, M.D., M.D.
Defendant:
SYED-BILAL AHMED, M.D., M.D., Individually and CENTRAL FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
Watts v. Sy et al
as 1:2024cv03213
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Watts
Defendant:
Dr. Larry Sy, Wexford Insurance and Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
STEDMAN, Nurse, KATHRYN CARHART, Nurse, RALPH, Nurse and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
