Cases 41 - 50 of 240
Clark v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00103
Respondent:
Correctional Officer S. Howard, Defendants Unknown, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Tony T. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65873
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Scarber et al
as 4:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Dontae T. Clark
Defendant:
Police Officers John Does 1-6, Police Chief Ernie Scarber, City of Ruleville, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv39544
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN T CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parr v. Forty Seven, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv02104
Defendant:
Ian T. Clark, Ravindra Majeti, Irving L. Weissman and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Parr
Demyon v. Forty Seven, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02111
Defendant:
Ian T. Clark, Ravindra Majeti, Irving L. Weissman and others
Plaintiff:
Cole Demyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Augustine v. Forty Seven, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01978
Defendant:
Ian T. Clark, Ravindra Majeti, Irving L. Weissman and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Augustine
Bushansky v. Forty Seven, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01853
Plaintiff:
Bushansky and Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Forty Seven, Inc, Ian T. Clark, Ravindra Majeti and others
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13430
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE T CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Naquin v. Jack et al
as 2:2020cv00548
Defendant:
Maj. Bergeron, Coby Dean, Dicky Haydel and others
Plaintiff:
Roland J. Naquin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
