Cases 41 - 50 of 329
Warner v. Target Stores Inc
as 2:2021cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kylie Warner
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Target Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REVILL v. TARGET STORES INC. et al
as 1:2021cv12819
Defendant:
JOHN DOES (11-20), TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET STORES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE REVILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coello v. Target Corporation
as 3:2021cv00838
Defendant:
Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores Inc and Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kiara Coello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conor Fennelly, et al v. Joe Rogness, et al
as 21-15094
Defendant:
CHRIS OHLSEN, TARGET STORES, INC., TONY ABENA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE ROGNESS and TODD ROOKE
Appellant:
CONOR FENNELLY and DOUGLAS RICHARD DOLLINGER
Plaintiff:
INDIEZONE, INC. and EOBUY, LIMITED
Padilla v. Target Stores, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Padilla
Defendant:
Target Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Sanofi-Aventis US LLC et al
as 9:2021cv80713
Defendant:
Chattem Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Donn H. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Sanofi-Aventis US LLC et al
as 4:2021cv03070
Defendant:
Chattem Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Walmart Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Donn H Walker and Donn H. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bravo v. Target Corporation
as 3:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
Sonia Bravo
Defendant:
Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Consumer Cellular Inc et al
as 6:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
Benjamin C. Smith
Defendant:
Target Store's Inc and Consumer Cellular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branscomb v. Target Stores, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Virginia Kay Branscomb
Defendant:
Target Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
