Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Marquette et al v. Pershing et al
as 3:2009cv00734
Plaintiff: Numa L Marquette, Jr., Numa L Marquette, Jr., Gail G Marquette and others
Defendant: Pershing, LLC, Pershing, LLC, Pershing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Shaw v. Deputy Aguirre et al
as 1:2009cv00834
Plaintiff: Christopher W. Shaw
Defendant: Deputy Aguirre and Deputy Mireles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J W. Shaw v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe R
as PAE/2:08-CV-89524
Plaintiff: J W. Shaw
Defendant: Burlington Northern & Santa Fe R
In re: Jeffrey Shaw, et al
as 08-8111
Debtor: In re: JEFFREY W. SHAW and VIOLA F. SHAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv05232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHAW v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89524
Plaintiff: J W SHAW and J W SHAW
Defendant: BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Edward W. Shaw v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-61143
Defendant: E.D. Bullard Co
Plaintiff: Edward W. Shaw
SHAW v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61143
Plaintiff: EDWARD W. SHAW, EDWARD W. SHAW, EDWARD W. SHAW and others
Defendant: E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Williams v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01591
Plaintiff: Brad A. Williams
Defendant: Darrel G. Adams, J. Akin and W. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00428
Petitioner: Thomas W Shaw
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?