Cases 51 - 60 of 264
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adams v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2018cv00610
Plaintiff:
James B. Adams
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horvath v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02347
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lee Horvath
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. , Thomas Dow , Alfredo Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAIL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv00934
Plaintiff:
MAIL TRANSPORTATION, INC. , CAUSLEY TRUCKING, INC. , FOREMAN BROTHERS, INC. and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
ADAMS v. DOE et al
as 1:2017cv01317
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jerry Olivier v. City of Clarksville, et al
as 17-5564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, LIEUTENANT B. ADAMS and CHIEF AL ANSLEY
Adames v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv03213
Plaintiff:
Rhona B. Adames
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Campbell v. Evans et al
as 5:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Winfred Campbell
Defendant:
Jeremy M Evans, Gary Evans, Charles B Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivier v. Clarksville, City of et al
as 3:2016cv03307
Plaintiff:
Jerry Olivier
Defendant:
Clarksville, City of, B. Adams and Al Rivers Ansley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Adams v. DOJ, et al
as 16-41138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
