Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 65
In re: American Electric
as 09-6051
Petitioner: AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., a New York Corporation
Respondent: OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL POWER AUTHORITY and PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD OF THE CITY OF BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS
Nottingham et al v. Appalachian Power Company et al
as 2:2009cv00200
Plaintiff: Samuel Nottingham, Samuel Nottingham, Crystal Nottingham and others
Defendant: Appalachian Power Company and American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority et al v. American Electric Power Company Inc
as 5:2008cv01055
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority, Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority, Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority and others
Defendant: American Electric Power Company Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-3356
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Native Village of Kivalina et al v. Exxonmobile Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv01138
Plaintiff: Native Village of Kivalina, Native Village of Kivalina, Native Village of Kivalina and others
Defendant: Exxonmobile Corporation, BP P.L.C., BP America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Amer Elec Power Co, et al v. Affiliated FM Ins Co We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-31061
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC, AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP and CENTRAL AND SOUTHWEST CORP
Defendant - Appellee: AFFILIATED FM INSURANCE CO
Type: Contract Insurance
Arandell Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01019
Plaintiff: Arandell Corp., Arandell Corp., Arandell Corp. and others
Defendant: Xcel Energy Inc., Xcel Energy Inc., Northern States Power Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Heartland Regional Medical Center et al v. Oneok, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00987
Plaintiff: Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant: Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing & Trading Company, LP, Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. American Electric Power Company Inc
as 2:2007cv02257
Plaintiff: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Defendant: American Electric Power Company Inc, American Electric Power Company Inc, Southwestern Electric Power Company and others
Counter Claimant: Southwestern Electric Power Company, Southwestern Electric Power Company, American Electric Power WR and others
Counter Defendant: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Special Master: Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation Featured Case
as 2:2007ml01816
Defendant: Carolina Power & Light Company, Citizens Communications, Time Warner Cable Inc and others
Counter Defendant: Ronald Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc., Xerox Global Services Inc and others
3Rd Party Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation, Intervoice Inc and Aspect Communications Corporation
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Macy's Inc, Bloomingdale's Inc, FDS Bank and others
Counter Claimant: 21st Century Casualty Company, Randall's Food Markets Inc, DIRECTV Holding, LLC and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn and Bernard H Chao
Petitioner: Target Corporation, Target Bank, Robert Cohn and others
Cross Defendant: International Business Machines Corp
Plaintiff: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?