Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Washington v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv12111
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillip Washington
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris Anthony Phillips v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv02279
Petitioner:
Morris Anthony Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Ledea v. Metro-Dade County Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv23117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillip Ledea
Defendant:
Metro-Dade County Police Department, Jorge Rodriguez, Alexis Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jumbo Bright Trading Limited et al v. The Gap Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08932
Defendant:
Does and Gap Inc
Plaintiff:
Jumbo Bright Trading Limited and Charles Anthony Phillip Pozzi
Keith Thomas v. Eric Pierson, et al
as 12-20384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC S. PIERSON, JANCY WILLIAMS, J. WASHINGTON and others
AKBAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as 2:2012cv02606
Plaintiff:
AKMAL HAKIM AKBAR , TERRY T. ALLEN , MIKE BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKBAR et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as PAE/2:12-cv-02606
Plaintiff:
AKMAL HAKIM AKBAR , TERRY T. ALLEN , MIKE BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Diggan v. Northumberland County Board of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00849
Plaintiff:
Allen Diggan
Defendant:
Northumberland County Board of Prisons , Richard Shoch , Vinny Clausi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Junior Phillips v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-1471
Petitioner:
JUNIOR ANTHONY PHILLIPS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Thomas v. Pierson et al
as 4:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Keith Thomas
Defendant:
Eris S. Pierson, Jancy Williams, J Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
