Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Medpay Systems, Inc. v. Medpay Assurance, LLC. et al
as 3:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Medpay Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Medpay Assurance, LLC., Tim B. Smith, Brad M. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
James Thomas v. Health Assurance, LLC, et al
as 12-10698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
HEALTH ASSURANCE, LLC, MIKE HALE, BETTY DAVIS and others
Estate of James Mack Allen v. Harrison County Mississippi et al
as 1:2011cv00510
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Mack Allen
Defendant:
Harrison County Mississippi, Harrison County Sheriff's Department, Melvin Brisolara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Agee v. Health Assurance LLC et al
as 2:2011cv04285
Plaintiff:
Christal Agee
Defendant:
Health Assurance LLC, Edwin Moyo, Karen Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkland et al v. First Revenue Assurance, LLC
as 3:2011cv03482
Plaintiff:
Shirley Kirkland , Martha Claxton , Bridgette Ford and others
Defendant:
First Revenue Assurance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas v. Health Assurance, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03611
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Health Assurance, LLC, Mike Hale, Betty Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. First Revenue Assurance, LLC
as 0:2011cv61800
Plaintiff:
Courtney W. Thompson
Defendant:
First Revenue Assurance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gomez v. Brisolara et al
as 1:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
Anthony LaSheen Gomez
Defendant:
Melvin T. Brisolara, Health Assurance LLC and High Cotton Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv05152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
