Cases 51 - 60 of 347
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Optinetix Inc. v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Optinetix Inc.
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Christine Alire, et al v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 21-55752
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTINE ALIRE
Plaintiff:
SHADI HAYDEN, JERRY HO, WILLIAM HANNUM and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE GAP, INC.
Defendant:
THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC., SEPHORA USA, INC., ADVANCE AUTO PARTS and others
Turnier et al v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01008
Defendant:
Does 1-50 and Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Moran and Robert Turnier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ij
Alves v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc
as 3:2021cv01466
Plaintiff:
Steven Alves
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hess et al v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04099
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Padilla and Donald Hess
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr
Blankenship v. Cost Plus of Texas Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Cost Plus of Texas Inc doing business as Cost Plus World Market and Cost Plus Inc
Plaintiff:
Barry Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Walker v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Reiner Walker
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Medicaid, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and Jane/John Doe(s) and XYZ Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
