Cases 51 - 60 of 263
Orso v. Rigell
as 2:2021mc00017
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as successor court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com for Receiver Kenneth D. Bell
Defendant:
Dorado Rigell
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. GD Construction Inc
as 4:2020cv01267
Defendant:
GD Construction Inc
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company doing business as AT&T Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Akkub v. Knott et al
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
C Bell, Granville, Bardon and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson Akkub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Moore et al
as 2:2020cv00246
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, M Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orso v. Layne
as 5:2021mc00007
Defendant:
Eddy Layne
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Orso in his capacity as successor court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as Zeek.Rewards.com for Receiver Kenneth D. Bell
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Orso v. Coulter et al
as 5:2021mc00008
Defendant:
Durant Brockett, Darren Miller, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso In his capacity as successor court appointed Receiver Rex Venture Group, LLC Receiver Kenneth D Bell doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Harris et al v. Springdale Home Care Services, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv05222
Plaintiff:
Kylee Bell and Patricia Harris
Defendant:
Springdale Home Care Services, LLC and LHC Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01374
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
USA v. Bell
as 4:2020cv01423
Defendant:
Jeremy W Bell
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Bell v. Hendrix
as 3:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
