Cases 51 - 60 of 16,822
Joseph v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv03081
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Loreen Armstrong, Unknown Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ubhi v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv02995
Plaintiff:
Maghar Ubhi
Defendant:
Jaime Leverton, Shenif Visram, Bill Tai and others
Jane Doe v. Aylo Holdings S.A.R.L. et al
as 2:2024cv03267
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Aylo Holdings S.A.R.L., Aylo Freesites, Ltd. Guardian Ad Litem f/k/a MG Freesites, Ltd. Guardian Ad Litem d/b/a Pornhub, Aylo Usa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maloney v. M&D Capital Premier Billing LLC
as 1:2024cv02945
Plaintiff:
Jillian Maloney
Defendant:
M&D Capital Premier Billing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medney v. Hut 8 Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv21482
Plaintiff:
Matthew Medney
Defendant:
Hut 8 Corp., Bill Tai, Mike Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Liles v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dustin Liles
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
